2017
DOI: 10.15580/gjer.2017.6.092417140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Senior Secondary Students’ Retention in Electrolysis Using Collaborative Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy (CCMIS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding coincides with the works of Ajaja (2011Ajaja ( , 2013, Martins-Omole et al ( 2016) who found in their separate studies that students exposed to learning photosynthesis by CM strategy, retained better than their counterparts in CTM. Also, the finding equally tallies with the work of Adeniran et al (2018), Ajayi andAngura (2017, Bawaneh (2019), Fatokun and Eniayeju (2014) who reported in their individual and collective studies that students taught Physics, Basic science, and Chemistry using CM, their retention ability are better enhanced than those taught with CTM. The considerable difference in mean retention scores between the CM and CTM groups could be ascribed to the fact that students in the CM group have actively participated in the teaching and learning process while creating concept maps, which may promote higher retention than students in the CTM group who were passively taught (Novak & Cañas, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding coincides with the works of Ajaja (2011Ajaja ( , 2013, Martins-Omole et al ( 2016) who found in their separate studies that students exposed to learning photosynthesis by CM strategy, retained better than their counterparts in CTM. Also, the finding equally tallies with the work of Adeniran et al (2018), Ajayi andAngura (2017, Bawaneh (2019), Fatokun and Eniayeju (2014) who reported in their individual and collective studies that students taught Physics, Basic science, and Chemistry using CM, their retention ability are better enhanced than those taught with CTM. The considerable difference in mean retention scores between the CM and CTM groups could be ascribed to the fact that students in the CM group have actively participated in the teaching and learning process while creating concept maps, which may promote higher retention than students in the CTM group who were passively taught (Novak & Cañas, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Gender disparities in science education have long been observed, and they continue to exist today (Jia et al, 2020;Okorie & Ezeh, 2016;Stevenson et al, 2021). According to a recent research review, sex inequalities in student achievement still exist, and they are primarily related to the kind of teaching strategies used by teachers (Adeniran et al, 2018;Ajayi & Angura, 2017;Bot & Eze, 2016;Fatokun & Eniayeju, 2014;Kyado et al, 2019;Odutuyi, 2019;Sor et al, 2018;Uchegbue & Amalu, 2020). Given these variations, as well as disparities in how students learn biology, biology teachers must be aware of them and respond appropriately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research by Rosa and Orey (2011) and Ajayi et al (2017) underscores that the application of modules and ethnochemical learning approaches can enhance the effectiveness of classroom learning and elevate student learning achievements. This heightened engagement also positively influences the development of student competencies across cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains (Febriana et al, 2014;Rahmawati et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, students do not adequately conceptualize the concept. Some of the reasons that contribute to students' difficulty in understanding biological concepts include the subject that comprises numerous abstract and complex relationships between and among concepts, the curriculum, which is overloaded, and the lack of teachers' pedagogical competence in the teaching and learning process (Ajayi & Angura, 2017;Angura & Abakpa, 2018;Cimer, 2012). Furthermore, the majority of teachers prefer the traditional teacher-centered approach to teaching biology concepts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the learner-centered teaching strategy is pertinent to biology instruction as it allows for the construction of meaningful knowledge and hands-on learning by encouraging students to interact with materials and specimens. Some of the innovative teaching approaches that have come up after research and have proved successful in learning biology in particular and science, in general, include project methods, problem-based learning (Bedemo, 2020), inquiry methods (Manishimwe et al, 2023), concept mapping (CM) (Abamba & Esiekpe, 2021;Ajayi & Angura, 2017;Huang et al, 2017), cooperative mastery learning (CML) (Nkirote et al, 2021), just but to mention a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%