Improving Screening Decision Making through Transactive Memory Systems: A Field Study

Abstract

In screening decisions, senior managers from various disciplines need to collaborate to evaluate innovation project proposals and decide about the allocation of scarce resources to selected projects. Screening decisions are complex and made under high levels of uncertainty, and are considered to be one of senior management's most challenging tasks. In the present field study, screening decision making is investigated from the perspective of a Transactive Memory System (TMS). TMS theory explains how cross‐disciplinary groups of people in interdependent relationships gain, store, combine, and utilize their knowledge in solving complex problems. According to this theory, a TMS emerges to the extent that team members manage to synchronize three core socio‐cognitive processes—specialization, building credibility, and coordination—to achieve team objectives. A theoretical model summarizing antecedents and consequences of the emergence of a TMS in a screening context is proposed and investigated using structural equation modeling. Data from 136 screening committees were used. Results show that the degree to which a committee acts as a TMS is positively related to decision‐making effectiveness as well as efficiency in a screening context. Transformational leadership and an open organizational climate are shown to act as antecedents of TMS emergence. Theoretical and managerial implications of these findings are discussed.

How Do Established Firms Produce Breakthrough Innovations? Managerial Identity‐Dissemination Discourse and the Creation of Novel Product‐Market Solutions

“…A five‐item instrument was employed to measure the difference in transformational leadership across firms. The use of these five items in the highly regarded Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Avolio et al, ; Bass and Avolio, ) and other work (e.g., Hammedi, van Riel, and Sasovova, ; Piccolo and Colquitt, ) attests to their validity for tapping into the construct domain. The items centered on the leader's actions to: (i) engage people with a clear vision, (ii) stimulate people to tackle old problems in new ways, (iii) encourage people to see environmental changes as opportunities, (iv) prioritize the interests of employees, and (v) praise employees for their work.…”

“…The items centered on the leader's actions to: (i) engage people with a clear vision, (ii) stimulate people to tackle old problems in new ways, (iii) encourage people to see environmental changes as opportunities, (iv) prioritize the interests of employees, and (v) praise employees for their work. In line with earlier research, the items were formulated and anchored to fit the study's context of data collection from single informants and the desire to use a consistent response format throughout the survey (Hammedi et al, ; Piccolo and Colquitt, ). Cronbach's reliability coefficient for the five‐item scale was .73.…”

One Master and Many End Users: Coordination Practices in Managing a Portfolio of Public Service Innovation Projects

“…However, other practices -for example decision-making success factors like reflexivity and transactive memory systems (Hammedi et al, 2013) -could support coordination among projects in the project portfolio towards the creation of integrated services. These practices have been demonstrated to be helpful on a project level and a screening committee level, but their effects on the level of the project portfolio remain unclear.…”

Collaboration in open-plan offices

“…Furthermore, McEvily, Soda, and Tortoriello Alongside researchers who conceptualises collaboration as a network, researchers who have described collaboration in terms of knowledge integration have also pointed to some relevant issues for the physical work environment. The knowledge integration view of collaboration involves understanding how people with different types of expertise are able to combine their knowledge to solve a shared problem, such as designing a product (Elsbach & Flynn, 2013), understanding the evolution of cancerous cells (Bruns, 2013), or awarding a research grant (Hammedi, Van Riel, & Sasovova, 2013). The most relevant line of inquiry to my research relates to the role of boundary objects as facilitators of collaboration.…”