2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/wacv56688.2023.00214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving saliency models’ predictions of the next fixation with humans’ intrinsic cost of gaze shifts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of these biases suggests that additional factors must contribute to the decision of where to saccade, here referred to as ‘saccade selection’. Recent evidence suggests that the effort involved with planning and executing (eye) movements may be one crucial factor [2225]. Effort is thought to be minimized whenever possible [26, 27], likely because it is costly to spend inherently limited cognitive resources [22, 28].…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%

Effort Drives Saccade Selection

Koevoet,
Van Zantwijk,
Naber
et al. 2024
Preprint
“…The presence of these biases suggests that additional factors must contribute to the decision of where to saccade, here referred to as ‘saccade selection’. Recent evidence suggests that the effort involved with planning and executing (eye) movements may be one crucial factor [2225]. Effort is thought to be minimized whenever possible [26, 27], likely because it is costly to spend inherently limited cognitive resources [22, 28].…”
Section: Mainmentioning
confidence: 99%

Effort Drives Saccade Selection

Koevoet,
Van Zantwijk,
Naber
et al. 2024
Preprint
“…Furthermore, eye movements have been proposed to be closely related to the planning horizon since they can be understood as information sampling in the visual environment [18] and have indeed been shown to be planned ahead [19]. Furthermore, the planning horizon and strategy can differ dynamically within a task and between subjects [20,21] not the least by the simple fact that human scan paths are not independent of individual behavioral preferences in gaze selection [22,23]. Recent work suggests that humans balance depth and breadth searches [24] and prune decision trees related to their plans when encountering large losses [25] in sequential decision making tasks different from mazes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%