2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharma.2019.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving safety of preparation and administration of medicines and enteral nutrition in a neonatal care unit: Global risk analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In premature infants, the incidence rate between the intervention group and the control group is more significant than that of the term infant group; in many systems, the incidence rate has been significantly reduced, and more system diseases showed statistical differences [ 11 ]. For example, there are significant differences in bradycardia (heart rate <100 beats/min), Apgar <7 points in 1 minute or 5 minutes after admission, and there are statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05); at the same time in the respiratory system, the incidence of oxygen demand, neonatal wet lung, and apnea in the intervention group was significantly reduced, and there were statistical differences ( P < 0.05); although aspiration pneumonia, RDS, and respiratory failure showed a downward trend in this group of studies, there was no statistical difference ( P > 0.05).…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In premature infants, the incidence rate between the intervention group and the control group is more significant than that of the term infant group; in many systems, the incidence rate has been significantly reduced, and more system diseases showed statistical differences [ 11 ]. For example, there are significant differences in bradycardia (heart rate <100 beats/min), Apgar <7 points in 1 minute or 5 minutes after admission, and there are statistically significant differences ( P < 0.05); at the same time in the respiratory system, the incidence of oxygen demand, neonatal wet lung, and apnea in the intervention group was significantly reduced, and there were statistical differences ( P < 0.05); although aspiration pneumonia, RDS, and respiratory failure showed a downward trend in this group of studies, there was no statistical difference ( P > 0.05).…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-existing risk analyses have been performed in the area of health care, but data in the literature on contracting out centralized injectable preparations are scarce. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Therefore, it was difficult to compare with other studies to improve our GRA. The implementation of the GRA requires significant time and effort.…”
Section: Study Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%