2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-018-0598-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving routing decisions in parallel non-observable queues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And since all the quantities in (4) remain properly defined for both batch-wise and job-wise routing, we choose (4) as the basic deterministic dispatching policy. The third class of routing policies further referred to as AA (Arrival-Aware) is based on the following intuitive idea (see Konovalov and Razumchik (2018)): longer inter-arrival times increase the probability of those system's states, which correspond to lower workloads in 8 One of the well-known examples of such a policy is the Round-Robin policy. It rotates the jobs between the queues in the cyclic order and thus is applicable only in the systems with homogeneous servers (i.e.…”
Section: Finite -Discrete -Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And since all the quantities in (4) remain properly defined for both batch-wise and job-wise routing, we choose (4) as the basic deterministic dispatching policy. The third class of routing policies further referred to as AA (Arrival-Aware) is based on the following intuitive idea (see Konovalov and Razumchik (2018)): longer inter-arrival times increase the probability of those system's states, which correspond to lower workloads in 8 One of the well-known examples of such a policy is the Round-Robin policy. It rotates the jobs between the queues in the cyclic order and thus is applicable only in the systems with homogeneous servers (i.e.…”
Section: Finite -Discrete -Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical examples in the next section give some impression on how these dispatching policies are ranked, 12 We conjecture that the algorithm of Konovalov and Razumchik (2018) can be adopted to the considered system at least in the case when the dispatcher operates in the batch-wise mode, i.e. assigns the whole batch to the same server.…”
Section: Finite -Discrete -Element Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second class of policies, which can be used in the given context, is the modification of the policy proposed in Konovalov and Razumchik (2018) for the minimization of the job's mean response time in non-observable queues with FIFO scheduling 11 . The dispatching rule is the following: send the first job to the queue with the fastest server; send the n-th job to the queue y n , where…”
Section: Overview Of the New Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, if initially the system is empty, the distribution p (m) n of the number of jobs in the queue m upon arrival of the n th , n ≥ 1, job can be computed recursively from the relations: 11 The following observation is forth noticing here. While there is no rational reason to use the arrival-aware (AA) policy, proposed in Konovalov and Razumchik (2018), in a PS server farm (when trying to minimize the mean response time or mean waiting time), it becomes reasonable as soon as the system's load is high and in the queues, instead of PS, the limited processor sharing policy (LPS) with the same/different multi-programming levels (MPL) is used. The intuition behind this idea is the following.…”
Section: Overview Of the New Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%