2007
DOI: 10.1109/acssc.2007.4487263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Robustness of Image Quality Measurement with Degradation Classification and Machine Learning

Abstract: Abstract-Image quality metrics can be classified as generic or degradation specific. Degradation specific measures perform poorly under "mismatched" conditions. Generic measures, on the other hand, may compromise quality measurement accuracy while gaining robustness to variation in distortion conditions. To improve the accuracy-robustness tradeoff, we employ supportvector degradation classification and machine learning tools to judiciously combine generic and degradation specific measures. To test our algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarity) [37] HVS HVS-MSE [34] NCC (Normalized Cross Correlation) [37] View synthesis NDSE (Noticeable Depth Synthesis Error) [43] distortion levels ([1, 1], [2,2], [3,3]) and three asymmetric distortion levels ( [1,2], [1,3], [2,3]). We conducted a subjective test to obtain MOS using the absolute category rating (ACR) [28].…”
Section: Mas (Mean Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similarity) [37] HVS HVS-MSE [34] NCC (Normalized Cross Correlation) [37] View synthesis NDSE (Noticeable Depth Synthesis Error) [43] distortion levels ([1, 1], [2,2], [3,3]) and three asymmetric distortion levels ( [1,2], [1,3], [2,3]). We conducted a subjective test to obtain MOS using the absolute category rating (ACR) [28].…”
Section: Mas (Mean Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies on image quality assessment [34], [35], [37], [38], [39], [40] and our own experience, we select 24 candidate features for further examination as listed in Table II. Then, we calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) to indicate the prediction performance between MOS and a single-feature-based quality scorer (with the exception that the singular value and the singular vector are integrated into one feature vector for the SVD scorer) over Datasets A and B, respectively.…”
Section: A Scorer Design For Texture Distortionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is therefore very interesting to develop an automatic method that mimic this HVS's capability. In recent years, much efforts have been devoted to the problem of identifying distortion in images and videos [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Most studies have focused on identifying a single type of distortion [26], however, images and videos can suffer from multiple distortions in most real-world applications [38], which is more challenging to address given the complex interactions and masking effect among distortions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%