Improving repeatability of capillary electrophoresis—a critical comparison of ten different capillary inner surfaces and three criteria of peak identification

Abstract

A poor repeatability of migration times caused by the fluctuations of electroosmotic flow (EOF) is an inherent weakness of capillary electrophoresis. Most researchers endeavor to prevent this problem using relative migration times or various capillary coatings which are expensive and not easy in comparison. Herein, we present an original approach to this problem: we apply a model sample designed to induce significant EOF instability, in order to critically compare ten capillary types with different physicochemical characteristics. Moreover, we accompany capillary modification with the evaluation of various criteria of peak identification: migration time, migration times ratio, and electrophoretic mobility. Our results show a great effectiveness of a dynamic coating in the stabilization of migration times, with the average RSD(%) value reduced from 3.5% (bare silica capillary) down to 0.5%. The good outcomes were also obtained for the surfactant-modified silica and amine capillaries. For the capillaries exhibiting significant instability of EOF, electrophoretic mobility turned out to be a more universal and reliable criterion of peak identification than relative migration time. It can be explained by an intrinsic dependency of migration times ratio on EOF change, which should always be considered during the selection of an internal standard.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-017-0382-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Assessment and Comparison of the Overall Analytical Potential of Capillary Electrophoresis and High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Using the RGB Model: How Much Can We Find Out?

“…However, the number of theoretical plates was assessed more favorably for CZE silica, allowing to maintain CSred above 50%. These observations are consistent with the generally prevailing belief as to the advantages and disadvantages of each technique [12][13][14][15][16], resulting from the specifics of the separation mechanism (repeatability, number of plates) and typically technical issues, such as optical path length (sensitivity). The value of CSgreen (eco-friendliness and safety) is significantly better for CZE silica, 52.0% vs. 69.3%, which allowed it to obtain a green primary color.…”

“…The eCAP amine capillary is characterized by a stable positively charged coating that causes reversal, stabilization, and often, increase of EOF [12]. As it can be seen from the comparison of (Figs.…”

Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry at Trial by Metabo-Ring: Effective Electrophoretic Mobility for Reproducible and Robust Compound Annotation

“…While it is possible to control suction effect from the ionization source, it may be difficult to tackle the adsorption of matrix components onto the inner capillary wall. 28 , 47 , 48 To correct for these sources of variability, the most popular method is the use of RMT. 40 , 49 , 50 This approach consists of comparing the velocity of the analyte ( v analyte ) to that of an internal standard (IS) ( v IS ).…”

Examining the Effects of Netropsin on the Curvature of DNA A-Tracts Using Electrophoresis

“…Minimizing the mobility due to EOF allows for faster run times and increased reproducibility between runs [ 74 ]. For this experimental work, the mobility due to EOF was kept very low with linear polyacrylamide-coated capillaries [ 75 ], but did vary slightly from run to run because of transient changes in capillary coating. The mobility due to EOF was measured in every new capillary and new background electrolyte [ 76 ].…”