2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eij.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving readability through extractive summarization for learners with reading difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between one nodes to another depicts the continuity of the meaning of the documents. The strongest and weakest relationship denotes the relevancy of the sentence flow [16]. Most of the graph-based text summarization have been carried out using the LexRank and TexRank method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between one nodes to another depicts the continuity of the meaning of the documents. The strongest and weakest relationship denotes the relevancy of the sentence flow [16]. Most of the graph-based text summarization have been carried out using the LexRank and TexRank method.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides sentence reduction and paraphrasing, there are several ways to summarize the text document, such as sentence split and join, generalization concept and specification concept [50]. Basically, automated text summarization has two types which are extractive and abstractive that have been described in The big challenge in text summarization research is how to produce readable summary [3], [4], [51], it means that the gap between summary result and reader understanding is not high. The elaboration of current text summarization can be made based on summarization approach (the way to summarize) [49], [50]; type of summary result [3], [52]- [54]; requirement of user [48], [55]; output style [48]; sentence weight [48], [56]; summarization impact [48]; available dataset [53], [56], [57] document type, summary unit [57], sources [57]; target and task-based [48]; language-based [48], [56] approach, objective of text summarization [48]; indicator representation [48], [52]; and document types [48], [57] as provided in Figure 5.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Text Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural network technique is used for summary extraction of science and social subjects in the educational text. [6] Synonyms based approach is used when the text summary is not target oriented or is very less i.e. less than 5% of the whole document.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%