2022
DOI: 10.1111/jep.13652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving providers' survival estimates and selection of prognosis‐ and guidelines‐appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic bone metastases: Development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Survival Decision Support Platform

Abstract: Rationale, Aims and Objectives: In the management of symptomatic bone metastases, current practice guidelines do not provide clear methodology for selecting palliative radiotherapy (RT) regimens based on specific patient and disease features. Decision support aids may offer an effective means for translating the complex data needed to render individualised treatment decisions, yet no such tools are available for use in this setting. Thus, we describe the development of the Bone Metastases Ensemble Trees for Su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individualized recommendations were generated using BMETS median predicted survival time and other patient-and diseasespecific characteristics, as previously detailed. 8 Physicians evaluated the same case histories at two time points, first without and then with the use of the BMETS-DSP output, separated by a washout period of 3-4 weeks, as per Cheng et al 16 The time between the start and completion of each phase of the assessment was ≤ 1 week. This project was approved by the institutional review board at the Johns Hopkins University (IRB00198589).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Individualized recommendations were generated using BMETS median predicted survival time and other patient-and diseasespecific characteristics, as previously detailed. 8 Physicians evaluated the same case histories at two time points, first without and then with the use of the BMETS-DSP output, separated by a washout period of 3-4 weeks, as per Cheng et al 16 The time between the start and completion of each phase of the assessment was ≤ 1 week. This project was approved by the institutional review board at the Johns Hopkins University (IRB00198589).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mirror the cut point used for appropriateness of spine surgery. 19 As previously described, 8 this cut point was also used to determine whether shorter fraction RT would be recommended. The 6-month time point (≤ 6 v .…”
Section: Outcome Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations