2017
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.22067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving power of association tests using multiple sets of imputed genotypes from distributed reference panels

Abstract: The accuracy of genotype imputation depends upon two factors: the sample size of the reference panel and the genetic similarity between the reference panel and the target samples. When multiple reference panels are not consented to combine together, it is unclear how to combine the imputation results to optimize the power of genetic association studies. We compared the accuracy of 9,265 Norwegian genomes imputed from three reference panels-1000 Genomes phase 3 (1000G), Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC), and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two strategies for developing reference panels, the first is to use a population with closely matched ancestry to that of the group under study, and the second is to use as many samples as possible. While not evaluated in the context of low-pass sequencing imputation, analysis of DNA arrays shows that reference panels matched to the population of interest outperform diverse reference panels of similar sizes (Mitt et al 2017; Zhou et al 2017; Bai et al 2019; Yoo et al 2019). This would suggest that larger refence panels are preferable as long as they contain sufficient representation of the study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are two strategies for developing reference panels, the first is to use a population with closely matched ancestry to that of the group under study, and the second is to use as many samples as possible. While not evaluated in the context of low-pass sequencing imputation, analysis of DNA arrays shows that reference panels matched to the population of interest outperform diverse reference panels of similar sizes (Mitt et al 2017; Zhou et al 2017; Bai et al 2019; Yoo et al 2019). This would suggest that larger refence panels are preferable as long as they contain sufficient representation of the study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observed effects were for initial population-matched reference panels of ~100 samples, with additional diverse samples increasing the reference panels to over 860 samples (Bai et al 2019). Other analyses compared references panels of > 1500 samples to the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) reference panel (http://www.haplotype-reference-consortium.org/) (McCarthy et al 2016; Mitt et al 2017; Zhou et al 2017; Yoo et al 2019), which consists of 32,611 samples, indicating the potential for increased resolution in human studies compared to canine studies, which used a panel of just 676 samples from 91 breeds (Piras et al 2020). Altogether, at MAFs > 0.05, human imputation studies conducted using DNA array genotypes show non-reference concordance rates > 97.5% and mean r 2 values > 0.95 (Mitt et al 2017; Zhou et al 2017; Yoo et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In total, approximately 70,000 HUNT individuals have been genotyped using the Illumina Human CoreExome v1.1 array from both HUNT2 (collected between 1995–1997) and HUNT3 (collected between 2006 and 2008). After quality control of the genotype data, 69,716 European ancestry samples were imputed using a combined Haplotype Reference Consortium reference panel and a population specific whole genome sequence-based imputation panel 25 . 11.2 M single nucleotide variants and 430,000 indels with high imputation quality (imputation R 2 > 0.9) and minor allele count >10 were included in the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For study populations that are not well represented by available reference panels, this problem is exacerbated (Herzig et al, 2018). When imputing genotypes in indigenous and founder populations, or even isolated populations of European ancestry, the results can be significantly improved when a subset of the sample are sequenced and included as a study specific reference panel (SSRP) (Deelen et al, 2014;Hou et al, 2017;Mitt et al, 2017;Pistis et al, 2015;Sidore et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2017;Herzig et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%