2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep19444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving power and accuracy of genome-wide association studies via a multi-locus mixed linear model methodology

Abstract: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used in genetic dissection of complex traits. However, common methods are all based on a fixed-SNP-effect mixed linear model (MLM) and single marker analysis, such as efficient mixed model analysis (EMMA). These methods require Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, which often is too conservative when the number of markers is extremely large. To address this concern, we proposed a random-SNP-effect MLM (RMLM) and a multi-locus RMLM (MRMLM) for GWAS. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
454
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(464 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
454
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S1) 11 . Analysis of molecular markers (more than 460 SSR) confirmed that each SSSL contained single substituted segment from a donor only, and all substitution segments of SSSLs were distributed on 12 chromosomes with the average size of 15.8 cM and the coverage rate of 97% over the whole rice genome 13 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1) 11 . Analysis of molecular markers (more than 460 SSR) confirmed that each SSSL contained single substituted segment from a donor only, and all substitution segments of SSSLs were distributed on 12 chromosomes with the average size of 15.8 cM and the coverage rate of 97% over the whole rice genome 13 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWAS analysis employed a linear mixed model, as implemented in the software GEMMA (Wang et al 2016), using dosages and a genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) to account for the complex family relationships within the HS population. We used the Leave One Chromosome Out (LOCO) method to guard against proximal contamination, as previously described Gonzales et al 2018).…”
Section: Genetic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using mrMLM v4.0, individual parameters may be changed in order to obtain the best results (Files S5 and S6). For example, the number of potentially associated SNPs for each chromosome in Zhang et al [20] is set at 50, and the search radius in mrMLM [16] and FASTmrMLM [17] is set at 20 kb in real data analysis. In addition, users should understand some parameter settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, Liu et al [14] developed FarmCPU. Based on the advantages of the random model of QTN effect over the fixed model [15], recently, we have developed six multi-locus methods: mrMLM [16], FASTmrMLM [17], FASTmrEMMA [18], ISIS EM-BLASSO [19], pLARmEB [20] and pKWmEB [21] (Files S1 and S2). These methods include two stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%