Improving photometric calibration of meteor video camera systems

Abstract

We present the results of new calibration tests performed by the NASA Meteoroid Environment Office (MEO) designed to help quantify and minimize systematic uncertainties in meteor photometry from video camera observations. These systematic uncertainties can be categorized by two main sources: an imperfect understanding of the linearity correction for the MEO's Watec 902H2 Ultimate video cameras and uncertainties in meteor magnitudes arising from transformations between the Watec camera's Sony EX-View HAD bandpass and the bandpasses used to determine reference star magnitudes. To address the first point, we have measured the linearity response of the MEO's standard meteor video cameras using two independent laboratory tests on eight cameras. Our empirically determined linearity correction is critical for performing accurate photometry at low camera intensity levels. With regards to the second point, we have calculated synthetic magnitudes in the bandpass for reference stars. These synthetic magnitudes enable direct calculations of the meteor's photometric flux within the camera band pass without requiring any assumptions of its spectral energy distribution. Systematic uncertainties in the synthetic magnitudes of individual reference stars are estimated at ∼ 0.20 mag, and are limited by the available spectral information in the reference catalogs. These two improvements allow for zero-points accurate to ∼ 0.05 - 0.10 mag in both filtered and unfiltered camera observations with no evidence for lingering systematics. These improvements are essential to accurately measuring photometric masses of individual meteors and source mass indexes.

Simultaneous optical and meteor head echo measurements using the Middle Atmosphere Alomar Radar System (MAARSY): Data collection and preliminary analysis

“…The pixel intensity for the Watec cameras is scaled according to the intensity dependent dual-gamma model of Ehlert et al (2016). The astrometric measurements from both sites are combined in a non-linear least squares solver to determine the best-fit path (Borovicka, 1990) and the light curve for each meteor from each station is then computed as a function of both height and time from each station.…”

Possible predictive formulas for quantitative and time-based estimation of muscle strength during motion

“…Further studies are necessary so that put to practical use in busy clinics. All data used for the prediction formulas were cut off to 30 samples per second, which is the same sampling frequency as the normal video camera 25,26) . This means the acquisition of angular information could be substituted from the movie 27) .…”

The Global Meteor Network -- Methodology and First Results

“…A typical vignetting coefficient for GMN cameras with 3.6 mm lenses is 0.057 deg/px at the video resolution of 1280 × 720 -the sensitivity in the corner of the image plane is only ∼ 40% relative to the center. Finally, from the definition of the magnitude (Ehlert et al 2017), it follows that the apparent meteor magnitude 𝑀 at a given time can be computed as: 𝑀 = −2.5 log 10 (𝑆 𝑝𝑥 ) + 𝑝 0 , (B3)…”