2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141195.66155.0c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Perioperative Outcome Expands the Role of Hepatectomy in Management of Benign and Malignant Hepatobiliary Diseases

Abstract: Perioperative outcome has improved despite extending the indication of hepatectomy to more high-risk patients. The role of hepatectomy in the management of hepatobiliary diseases can be expanded. Reduced perioperative transfusion is the main contributory factor for improved outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

41
489
4
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 630 publications
(544 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
41
489
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of distant metastasis, main portal vein thrombosis, or inferior vena cava thrombosis is a definite contraindication for resection. Hepatic resection for HCC is associated with a hospital mortality rate of less than 5% in major centers; however, the complication rate remains high, around 30-40% in large series [253][254][255]. Serious complications such as liver failure, postoperative bleeding, and bile leak occur in less than 5% of patients after hepatectomy nowadays [253][254][255].…”
Section: Liver Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of distant metastasis, main portal vein thrombosis, or inferior vena cava thrombosis is a definite contraindication for resection. Hepatic resection for HCC is associated with a hospital mortality rate of less than 5% in major centers; however, the complication rate remains high, around 30-40% in large series [253][254][255]. Serious complications such as liver failure, postoperative bleeding, and bile leak occur in less than 5% of patients after hepatectomy nowadays [253][254][255].…”
Section: Liver Resectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Despite many technical advances, intraoperative bleeding remains a problem during liver resection with 30-40% of patients receiving perioperative blood transfusions. [6][7][8] Blood transfusion carries several risks, including transfusion-transmitted viruses, transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion-associated circulatory overload, acute hemolytic transfusion reactions, bacterial contamination and severe allergic reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in preoperative assessment, surgical techniques, anesthesiology, and postoperative care have progressively lowered the perioperative risk of liver resections and thereby widened operative indications. [1][2][3] This has markedly increased the number of patients evaluated for liver resections. 4 Besides this, increased life expectancy and improved general health status lead to an increase in the number of elderly patients eligible for liver resection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%