2010
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving performance of saturation-based PID controllers for rigid robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unmodeled part d l (t) may represent an energy-bounded disturbance. Furthermore, the linear combination of constant disturbances and sinusoidal functions can be modeled in the form of (3), (4). More generally, by the expansion of the Fourier series, any periodic disturbance can be modeled in this form.…”
Section: Description Of Robotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The unmodeled part d l (t) may represent an energy-bounded disturbance. Furthermore, the linear combination of constant disturbances and sinusoidal functions can be modeled in the form of (3), (4). More generally, by the expansion of the Fourier series, any periodic disturbance can be modeled in this form.…”
Section: Description Of Robotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we demonstrate the effects of the adaptive learning control scheme of model (3), (4). In order to highlight the effectiveness of learning capability with different choice of modeled harmonic components, we suppose here that F(x e ) is entirely known.…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sufficiency: If (3) holds, according to Lemma 1, we have the following matrix inequality (8). Sufficiency: If (3) holds, according to Lemma 1, we have the following matrix inequality (8).…”
Section: Linear Matrix Inequality Formulation Lemma 1 ([6] a Slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. Sufficiency: If (3) holds, according to Lemma 1, we have the following matrix inequality (8). Multiplying both sides of the matrix in (8) by diag(P -1 , I, I, P -1 ), matrix inequality (9) follows.…”
Section: Linear Matrix Inequality Formulation Lemma 1 ([6] a Slmentioning
confidence: 99%