2006
DOI: 10.1109/iwqos.2006.250452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Performance of Internet Services Through Reward-Driven Request Prioritization

Abstract: Meeting client QoS expectations proves to be a difficult task for the providers of modern Internet services, especially when web servers experience overload conditions (steady or transient), which cause increased response times and request rejections, leading to user frustration, lowered usage of the service and reduced revenues. In this paper, we propose a server-side request scheduling mechanism that addresses these problems. Our Reward-Driven Request Prioritization (RDRP) algorithm gives higher execution pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of scheduling requests based on the estimated service time, they prioritized the requests which are more likely to originate from legitimate clients. Totok and Karamcheti [10] proposed a reward-driven request prioritization mechanism. This mechanism predicts the future structure of web sessions and gives higher execution priority to the requests whose sessions are likely to bring more reward.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of scheduling requests based on the estimated service time, they prioritized the requests which are more likely to originate from legitimate clients. Totok and Karamcheti [10] proposed a reward-driven request prioritization mechanism. This mechanism predicts the future structure of web sessions and gives higher execution priority to the requests whose sessions are likely to bring more reward.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, once the auction site is under heavy load conditions, instead of rejecting all the requests, it can selectively accept the revenue-generating requests mentioned above. Similar techniques which use priority scheduling for revenue generating transactions were proposed in [22,23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our ID profiling module does not need to track the internal navigational sequence of a customer session. This is the key difference between our mechanism and RDRP proposed in [13]. RDRP focuses on the inter-request structure within a session, thus relies on the accurate tracking of the internal structure of CBMGs.…”
Section: A Id Profiling Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of session integrity has been studied in [4], [5], and session-based admission control (SBAC) mechanisms has been proposed in [5]. More recently, Reward-Driven Request Prioritization (RDRP) mechanism [13] gives higher execution priority to the requests whose sessions are likely to bring more profit. However, these mechanisms focus on inter-request relationship within a session only, and none of them attempt to use the inter-session purchase record of a client for making admission decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%