2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ssci.2017.8280953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving performance of CDCL SAT solvers by automated design of variable selection heuristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, when predictions by a deep architecture were used periodically, to re-set the variable activities (for example Selsam and Bjørner (2019) and Han (2020a)). Second, when existing variable scores were used as inputs for a modified calculation of variable scores (for example Flint and Blaschko (2012) and Illetskova et al (2017)).…”
Section: Are Hybrid Methods the Sweet Spot?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, when predictions by a deep architecture were used periodically, to re-set the variable activities (for example Selsam and Bjørner (2019) and Han (2020a)). Second, when existing variable scores were used as inputs for a modified calculation of variable scores (for example Flint and Blaschko (2012) and Illetskova et al (2017)).…”
Section: Are Hybrid Methods the Sweet Spot?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term hyperheuristic is commonly used within the GA/GP literature when referring to a method that either chooses the best of an existing set of heuristics (a selective hyperheuristic), or constructs a new heuristic (a generative hyperheuristic). In Bertels (2016), Bertels andTauritz (2016), andIlletskova et al (2017), the ADSSEC system is described. This employs GPs to construct heuristics for variable selection and learned clause ranking, by combining elements of existing heuristics used by CDCL solvers.…”
Section: Gas For Learning Cdcl Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SATzilla [154] integrates several solvers and builds an empirical hardness model for solver selection. Some work [42,61,71] evolve heuristics through genetic algorithms by combining existing primitives, with the latter two aiming at specializing the created heuristics to particular problem classes. There have also been other approaches utilizing reinforcement learning to discover variable selection heuristics [41,78,[85][86][87].…”
Section: Machine Learning For Sat Solvermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provide more computational resources to islands which are more promising. [102] develop a parallel GPHH approach toward improving the performance of SAT solvers by automatically configuring them for a SAT problem. Similarly [214,233,246] are some other works which develop parallel hyper-heuristic approaches.…”
Section: Parallel Hyper-heuristics and Moeasmentioning
confidence: 99%