2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2014.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving peer neighborhood on P2P video distribution networks using Push/Pull protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In theory, an ideal protocol guarantees that at every τ i , every node has one packet that some neighbor needs [1]. In practice this is not true due to, e.g., limited buffer size or congestion.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In theory, an ideal protocol guarantees that at every τ i , every node has one packet that some neighbor needs [1]. In practice this is not true due to, e.g., limited buffer size or congestion.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed cooperative delivery of contents in networks is essential for several applications, in particular for peer-to-peer live video streaming. Live streaming tolerates some packet loss but puts a strong focus on timely delivery and on a balanced distribution of delays among the peers [1], [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol adapts a P2P topology and pulls contributing peers together while pushing free-riders away. A similar push-and-pull protocol was adopted by Oliveira et al [Oliveira, Prado, De Lima et al (2015)] to insulate free-riding nodes in P2P networks that distribute video streams. It also classified uncooperative nodes.…”
Section: Reciprocity-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the scarcity of storage and computation resource for both the users and content providers in multimedia service networks can be easily overcome by integrating cloud service and social network into a cloud-based multimedia social network. Most of previous studies on P2P networks assume that all the users are homogeneous [6][7][8], that is, they are purely mobile users or purely desktop users. Actually, users in the same network are impossible to be completely homogeneous because they may differ greatly in bandwidth limit and access scheme, which thereby impacts the QoS of different users if they are treated equally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%