2008
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Pediatric Dosing Through Pediatric Initiatives: What We Have Learned

Abstract: Critical changes in drug labeling for pediatric patients illustrate that unique pediatric dosing often is necessary, reflecting growth and maturational stages of pediatric patients. These changes provide evidence that pediatric dosing should not be determined by simply applying weight-based calculations to the adult dose. Drug clearance is highly variable in the pediatric population and is not readily predictable on the basis of adult information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A These changes have resulted in alterations in the labelling of over 100 medications, because the research identified heterogeneous pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across the stages of child development when these drugs were specifically studied. 6 Similar strategies exist in the European Union where pharmaceutical companies that undertake pediatric research in orphan drugs are given an additional two years on marketing exclusivity. B However, in our study, all off-label drugs, except two, were non-proprietary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A These changes have resulted in alterations in the labelling of over 100 medications, because the research identified heterogeneous pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics across the stages of child development when these drugs were specifically studied. 6 Similar strategies exist in the European Union where pharmaceutical companies that undertake pediatric research in orphan drugs are given an additional two years on marketing exclusivity. B However, in our study, all off-label drugs, except two, were non-proprietary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 When drugs are studied rigorously in children, it is clear that dosage regimes based on age, weight, and body surface area do not reflect actual pharmacokinetics of the drugs across the various stages of pediatric development. 6 Additionally, while a given drug may be effective in adult models of disease, in children, the optimal dose is often unknown, the efficacy is uncertain, the side effects are not established, and adverse outcomes are not described. Currently, before a drug is approved for pediatric use, rigorous studies in children (or in a pediatric sub-population, such as neonates) are required in order to devise a product monograph that specifies a clinical indication, a dosing schedule, and a formulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review conducted by Rodriguez and co-workers reported that dosing changes were made for more than 20% of 108 drugs in response to the results from a required paediatric pharmacokinetic study. This highlights the limitations of extrapolation of adult dosages into paediatric populations [76].…”
Section: Paediatric Dose Selectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[1][2][3][4] Clinicians often treat children with offlabel and unlicensed medications that have been tested in and approved for adult populations without pediatricspecific guidelines, with as many as 78% of hospitalized children receiving medications lacking age-specific approval. 3,[5][6][7] The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) and the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA), both of which were permanently reauthorized in May of 2012, seek to increase the study of drugs in children and address some of the concerns with the pediatric research infrastructure that have long been recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%