1998
DOI: 10.1097/00001786-199812000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Patient Outcomes through CQI: Vascular Access Planning

Abstract: This article reports the use of the continuous quality improvement (CQI) process to improve patient outcomes. The FADE method (focus, analyze, develop, and execute) was used to focus on vascular access planning, analyze data concerning intravenous (i.v.) therapy, develop a vascular access planning algorithm, and execute implementation of the algorithm. An evaluation study revealed that patients whose vascular access planning was consistent with the algorithm reported fewer i.v.s, less difficulty starting i.v.s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 A third study conducted at a university teaching hospital reviewed vascular access by staff nurses from inpatient pediatric, medical, surgical, and intensive care units. 3 This study reported the mean number of attempts to obtain peripheral IV access as 2.2, with one in four patients experiencing treatment delays secondary to difficult access. 3 The difficult IV access (DIVA) score is the product of a recent study by Yen et al, 4 the goal of which was to identify factors that contribute to difficult IV catheter placement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 A third study conducted at a university teaching hospital reviewed vascular access by staff nurses from inpatient pediatric, medical, surgical, and intensive care units. 3 This study reported the mean number of attempts to obtain peripheral IV access as 2.2, with one in four patients experiencing treatment delays secondary to difficult access. 3 The difficult IV access (DIVA) score is the product of a recent study by Yen et al, 4 the goal of which was to identify factors that contribute to difficult IV catheter placement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3 This study reported the mean number of attempts to obtain peripheral IV access as 2.2, with one in four patients experiencing treatment delays secondary to difficult access. 3 The difficult IV access (DIVA) score is the product of a recent study by Yen et al, 4 the goal of which was to identify factors that contribute to difficult IV catheter placement. That study assessed 16 candidate variables, ultimately developing a four-variable proportionally weighted rule (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Multiple factors need to be weighed when considering use of a VAD, and the type of infusion system chosen must be individualized [26,65]. Issues to be considered include the patient's overall clinical status, age, and vein condition; the diagnosis; current vascular access; antimicrobials prescribed and their frequency of administration; need for a programmable infusion pump; and the anticipated duration of therapy [66].…”
Section: Antimicrobial Selection and Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 (B) Patients and their families still currently play a minor role in the selection of VAD at the onset of treatment, notwithstanding the evidence showing that patient involvement is associated with greater patient satisfaction, fewer delays in therapy related to loss of vascular access, fewer device complications, preservation of peripheral veins, less nursing time spent attempting to gain vascular access, shorter hospital stays, fewer emergency room visits, and decreased infusion therapy costs. 7 However, most patients who require intravenous therapy for longer than 1 week are not routinely assessed for intermediate dwelling VADs. In addition, patient satisfaction about long-term VADs has rarely been addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%