2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving path duration in high mobility vehicular ad hoc networks

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a high-speed highway mobility scenario, where the available knowledge about the network's topology is used to improve the routing path duration. The improvement is mainly due to the use of a topology control algorithm, which increases the path duration by decreasing the probability of path breaks. For network regions having an enough density of vehicles, the packets are preferentially routed over the oldest links created by the vehicles moving in the same direction. For smaller value… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, the vehicle direction toward the destination with high vehicle density is projected for routing and is considered to be a favorable metrics. However, without vehicle direction, the route with the same vehicle density but in two directions has higher breakage probability [30]. DECA only uses vehicle density and suffers more from this issue compared to the DAR-RH, ARP-QD, and real-time protocols.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basically, the vehicle direction toward the destination with high vehicle density is projected for routing and is considered to be a favorable metrics. However, without vehicle direction, the route with the same vehicle density but in two directions has higher breakage probability [30]. DECA only uses vehicle density and suffers more from this issue compared to the DAR-RH, ARP-QD, and real-time protocols.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, only using the vehicular density measurement is not suitable without vehicular spatial distribution in the network. Taking vehicle density with direction metrics into account will lead to better performance and lower connection breakage probability compared to routes with the same density, as stated in [30]. Some RAR protocols, such as VLBR and iCARII, utilize statistical density.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• While calculating vehicular density direction of vehicles should be taken into account. In particular, routes with vehicles moving towards a destination in high density will have less breakage probability than routes with the same density but with vehicles moving away from destination, as stated in [31]. • Forwarding collector packets, which measure routing metrics, along a path using greedy forwarding may result in loosing such packets.…”
Section: Challenges and Issues To Considermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Papageorgiou'et al (2012) discuss an implementation, which adds on a module for ns-2 to provide more realistic mobility models. Further examples include Oliveira et al (2013) [83] looking at high mobility vehicular ad hoc networks, [84,85] considering connectivity in disaster response, and Bernsen and Manivannan (2012) [86] evaluating their VANET routing protocol, Reliable Inter-Vehicular Routing (RIVER). ns-2 is so commonly used and so well-known in MANET research that many papers merely state that it has been used with no discussion or justification at all.…”
Section: Ns-2 and Ns-3 In Mobile Ad Hoc Network Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%