Improving Participatory Processes through Collective Simulation: Use of a Community of Practice

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Stakeholder and public participation in natural resources management (NRM) is now widely accepted as necessary to achieve sustainable development outcomes. Yet, effective implementation of participatory processes necessitates wellcalibrated methods and tools, as well as carefully honed facilitation skills that are difficult to gain without practice. Practitioners and academics leading these processes are thus encouraged to better reflect on, prepare, and justify their interventions, before starting to work in the field with stakeholders. Our paper shows how a Simulation Community of Practice (SCoP) was set up to support improved participatory practice. The specificity of this community is that its members not only discuss planned participatory interventions, but also simulate these processes by adopting roles of future participants, and by working through the different steps of the workshop that will be later implemented in the field. The evaluation of our approach shows that individual and social learning of participants in the SCoP is developed, leading mainly to improved facilitator skills and to calibration of the participatory methods and tools being tested. A space is also provided for deepening reflection on the purposes of the participatory process and the values that guide these interventions. Our experience could provide a model for others around the world to set up their own SCoP to support participatory NRM practice. Further improvements to our SCoP and new ones could be made by enhancing the feedback mechanisms between the field sites and the community, in order to encourage more cumulative learning and to reinforce the members' interest, maintaining their involvement in the community over time.

How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: a review

“…In addition, the tools must incorporate uncertainty due to relations between management, biodiversity and ecosystem services, in addition to the uncertainty caused by contextual factors such as climatic conditions. Tools need to be user-friendly and easily implementable because agricultural stakeholders' time is limited (Dionnet et al 2013). Finally, learning tools must be flexible and robust, i.e., adaptable and adapted to a wide range of biophysical and farming contexts (see Section 2.2.2; Giller et al 2009;Martin 2015).…”

Learning from collaborative research on sustainably managing fresh water: implications for ethical research–practice engagement

“…Steyaert and Jiggins (2007:582) documented an approach of continually reflecting on "the practices of research and the ethics of being a researcher" and generated a synthesis through a community of practice (Wenger 1998) involving researchers and case-study participants from a large, multicountry program of water governance research-practice engagement. Similar communities of practice have since been formed to provide safe spaces not only for researchers but also for researchers and practitioners of participatory practice to "practice their practice" through facilitation trials and simulation of participatory processes in a range of natural resources management domains, including water management (Dionnet et al 2013). Through simulation, often ethical dilemmas will appear before they do in the field, allowing participants to reflect on and hopefully develop strategies for addressing them before they arise in reality.…”

Water Governance in the Face of Global Change

“…By focusing on the cognitive processes of individuals in a social context, the original concept did not consider group processes such as the development of shared meanings and values. Over the past decades, the concept has turned into a normative approach with design principles about how CoPs can be established, 1 and its application in resource governance and management (Dionnet et al 2013). Jean Lave, an anthropologist, and Etienne Wenger, originally trained in computer science and artificial intelligence, coined the concept of 'Community of Practice (CoP)'.…”