2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4092-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving ovarian cancer imaging with LHRH-NBs: an experimental study

Abstract: PurposeOur previous study used freeze-drying and biotin–avidin binding methods and obtained nontargeted nanobubbles (N-NBs) and ovarian cancer-targeting nanobubbles (LHRH-NBs, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone nanobubbles). Our study also identified the physical and chemical properties of these two contrast agents, and validated the targeting ability and underlying mechanisms of LHRH-NBs in vitro. The present study investigated the imaging of N-NBs and LHRH-NBs in nude mice and their binding with tissues.M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanobubbles have shown improved permeation into tissue and longer tissue retention times relative to microbubbles in non-ovarian tumor studies [ 118 ]. They have also demonstrated good signal accumulation and retention in ovarian tumor bearing mice, however, in recent nanobubbles studies as both untargeted contrast agents and as molecular imaging agents [ 119 , 120 , 121 ]. Critically, however, these studies are limited to xenograft subcutaneous ovarian tumors, and the technology has yet to be implemented in orthotopic or syngeneic models.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Nanoparticles For Ovarian Cancer Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanobubbles have shown improved permeation into tissue and longer tissue retention times relative to microbubbles in non-ovarian tumor studies [ 118 ]. They have also demonstrated good signal accumulation and retention in ovarian tumor bearing mice, however, in recent nanobubbles studies as both untargeted contrast agents and as molecular imaging agents [ 119 , 120 , 121 ]. Critically, however, these studies are limited to xenograft subcutaneous ovarian tumors, and the technology has yet to be implemented in orthotopic or syngeneic models.…”
Section: Recent Developments Of Nanoparticles For Ovarian Cancer Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the application of micro/ nano-scale bubbles is very extensive. [10][11][12] The initial microbubbles have no membrane coating, so the action time in vivo is very short. The current microbubbles are vesicles coated with a shell membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%