2012
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving outcomes from acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Table 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37,38 It is also suggested that improvement in care can be measured by the proportion of patients, in whom endoscopy was done within 24 hours. 39 In our study endoscopy was done within 24 to 48 hours only and all patient could not undergoendoscopy within 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 It is also suggested that improvement in care can be measured by the proportion of patients, in whom endoscopy was done within 24 hours. 39 In our study endoscopy was done within 24 to 48 hours only and all patient could not undergoendoscopy within 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age 65 years was chosen because that is the mean age of patients presenting to the ED with upper GI bleeds with a moderate to high risk of hemorrhage (Glasgow-Blatchford score >0) which represents over 90% of all patients with suspected upper GI bleeds. [7][8][9][10] We tested two scenarios with mild and moderate risks of requiring invasive hemostasis intervention (i.e, endoscopic, surgical, etc.) Our model assumed that the suspected upper GI bleed requires further evaluation and that the four diagnostic strategies were available: (1) direct imaging with video capsule endoscopy performed in the ED, (2) risk stratification using the Glasgow-Blatchford score, (3) nasogastric tube placement and finally, (4) an admit-all strategy in which every patient suspected of an upper GI hemorrhage is admitted to hospital.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,10,20 The probability of re-bleeding after initial hemostasis was 12% and of these patients, there was a 30.6% probability of re-bleeding. 8 Patients who re-bled for a second time will have surgery to perform a duodenal or gastric suture and there is a risk of mortality from the procedure of 4%. 21 Costs-We used 2012 Medicare data for diagnosis related groups (DRGs) and relative value units (RVUs) as surrogates for facility and professional costs, respectively ( Table 2).…”
Section: Model Parameters/input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords Non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding Á Ulcers peptic and other Á Over-the-scope clip Á Endoscopy upper GI tract Despite major advances in the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) over the past decade including prevention of peptic ulcer bleeding, optimal use of endoscopic therapy and high-dose proton pump inhibition, this still carries considerable morbidity, mortality and health economic burden [1]. Of particular note are the re-bleeding rates, one of the most crucial predictive factors of morbidity and mortality that has not significantly improved as evident from longitudinal data in the past 15 years [2,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%