2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39250-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Objective Speech Quality Indicators in Noise Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They indicated that one of the most important factors impairing SI or AI is fluctuating noise, especially speech embedded in fluctuating maskers, e.g., competing talkers [3,23,24]. Lombard effect is another factor impeding SI or speech quality evaluation [25]. More limitation factors were identified in the context of hearing aids, i.e., peak-clipping and center-clipping distortions in the speech signal [26], cochlear implants, i.e., STOI (Short-Time Objective Intelligibility) [27], or noise suppression algorithms [28].…”
Section: State-of-the-art Of the Speech Intelligibility Assessment Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They indicated that one of the most important factors impairing SI or AI is fluctuating noise, especially speech embedded in fluctuating maskers, e.g., competing talkers [3,23,24]. Lombard effect is another factor impeding SI or speech quality evaluation [25]. More limitation factors were identified in the context of hearing aids, i.e., peak-clipping and center-clipping distortions in the speech signal [26], cochlear implants, i.e., STOI (Short-Time Objective Intelligibility) [27], or noise suppression algorithms [28].…”
Section: State-of-the-art Of the Speech Intelligibility Assessment Me...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called Lombard effect is a widely known phenomenon that is induced when the speaker unconsciously changes acoustic features of uttered speech in noise conditions. Even though this effect is known from 1911, there are many studies that have analyzed Lombard speech in the last two decades [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], especially as there are no indicators or measures that apply directly to assessing the quality of speech in such conditions [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. In contrast, there are not too many works on the effect of reverberation on speech uttering and to what degree it affects speech intelligibility [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lombard speech, effects such as the following are observed: increasing the level of sound energy, raising the fundamental frequency of the signal, shifting energy from lower frequency bands to higher frequency bands, increasing formants, the duration of vowels, the spectral tilt, etc. [ 8 , 10 , 20 , 21 ]. On the other hand, reverberation enforces persons to slow down their speech, but the differences in slowed speech over uttered word distribution are not uniform [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%