2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Object Localization with Fitness NMS and Bounded IoU Loss

Abstract: We demonstrate that many detection methods are designed to identify only a sufficently accurate bounding box, rather than the best available one. To address this issue we propose a simple and fast modification to the existing methods called Fitness NMS. This method is tested with the DeNet model and obtains a significantly improved MAP at greater localization accuracies without a loss in evaluation rate, and can be used in conjunction with Soft NMS for additional improvements. Next we derive a novel bounding b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At last, one can observe that the performance of CenterNet is also competitive with the two-stage approaches, e.g., the single-scale testing AP of CenterNet511-52 is comparable to the two-stage approach Fitness R-CNN [41] (41.6% vs. 41.8%) and that of CenterNet511-104 is comparable to D-RFCN + SNIP [38] (44.9% vs. 45.7%), respectively. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that twostage approaches usually use larger resolution input images (e.g., ∼ 1000 × 600), which significantly improves the detection accuracy especially for small objects.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At last, one can observe that the performance of CenterNet is also competitive with the two-stage approaches, e.g., the single-scale testing AP of CenterNet511-52 is comparable to the two-stage approach Fitness R-CNN [41] (41.6% vs. 41.8%) and that of CenterNet511-104 is comparable to D-RFCN + SNIP [38] (44.9% vs. 45.7%), respectively. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that twostage approaches usually use larger resolution input images (e.g., ∼ 1000 × 600), which significantly improves the detection accuracy especially for small objects.…”
Section: Comparisons With State-of-the-art Detectorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are several methods focusing on correcting the classification score for the detection box, which have a similar goal to our method. Tychsen-Smith et al [36] proposed Fitness NMS that corrected the detection score using the IoU between the detected bounding boxes and their ground truth. It formulates box IoU prediction as a classification task.…”
Section: Detection Score Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the more pairs we sample, the more accurate the approximation is, while the computational cost is heavier. We adopt a variant of bounded iou loss [29] to optimize the shape prediction, without computing the target. The loss is defined in Eq.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%