2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.525714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving nonlinear up-scaling by adapting to the local edge orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These settings were empirically determined to achieve good results. Figures 5 and 6 show results of TEXAS compared with the original image, linear scaling, and scaling involving nonlinear edge enhancement [14]. 3 Both the non-linear method and TEXAS improve the edge sharpness compared to linear scaling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These settings were empirically determined to achieve good results. Figures 5 and 6 show results of TEXAS compared with the original image, linear scaling, and scaling involving nonlinear edge enhancement [14]. 3 Both the non-linear method and TEXAS improve the edge sharpness compared to linear scaling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…24,25 In LTI, the gradient of an edge is improved by modifying both sides symmetrically around the edge center. According to Ref.…”
Section: Clipped Quadratic Weighted Median Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By amplifying the high frequency part of the signal, the resulting picture has a better sharpness impression. Most peaking have a single fixed peaking frequency (for example 2.7MHz for NTSC, 3.5MHz for PAL), while modern implementations like PixelPlus [3] and AutoTV [4] have multiple peaking filters so that they can adapt to frequency components that are available in the signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%