Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-021-01318-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving nonconformity responsibility decisions: a semi-automated model based on CRISP-DM

Abstract: Nonconformity (NC) management is a fundamental process in production, yet the literature notion of it does not always align with what is practiced in reality. In particular, the literature often excludes the NC responsibility decision, which is a difficult, costly and time-consuming task assignment, but also an integral part of the NC management process. We propose a semi-automated model we call SANC, which improves the accuracy of NC responsibility decisions and significantly cuts their costs. We base our met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on Big Data. This paper uses the data mining CRISP-DM model to extract financial risk characteristics and combines the knowledge of system framework and information system to develop and design a new unit financial risk management mechanism, that is, response system programming [20]. This process treats the entire risk management process as a control system consisting of five main components: input, control system, execution system, project design, and data output.…”
Section: Feature Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Big Data. This paper uses the data mining CRISP-DM model to extract financial risk characteristics and combines the knowledge of system framework and information system to develop and design a new unit financial risk management mechanism, that is, response system programming [20]. This process treats the entire risk management process as a control system consisting of five main components: input, control system, execution system, project design, and data output.…”
Section: Feature Designmentioning
confidence: 99%