2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving NMR Structures of RNA

Abstract: SUMMARY Here, we show that modern solution NMR structures of RNA exhibit more steric clashes and conformational ambiguities than their crystallographic X-ray counterparts. To tackle these issues, we developed RNA-ff1, a new force field for structure calculation with Xplor-NIH. Using seven published NMR datasets, RNA-ff1 improves covalent geometry and MolProbity validation criteria for clashes and backbone conformation in most cases, relative to both the previous Xplor-NIH force field and the original structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(90 reference statements)
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results mirror the influence of the new protein-3.1 force field that is used with REPEL, where the new Molprobity atomic radii alleviate clashes and improve the clashscore, as observed for the other proteins in our test test (Fig. 2e) and for nucleic acids (Bermejo et al 2016). In addition, the torsionDB term (Bermejo et al 2012) helps increase the number of favored side chain rotamers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results mirror the influence of the new protein-3.1 force field that is used with REPEL, where the new Molprobity atomic radii alleviate clashes and improve the clashscore, as observed for the other proteins in our test test (Fig. 2e) and for nucleic acids (Bermejo et al 2016). In addition, the torsionDB term (Bermejo et al 2012) helps increase the number of favored side chain rotamers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We also examined the performance of the REPEL potential with two versions of the standard Xplor-NIH force field: protein-1.0, which retains many features of the parallhdg.pro and topallhdg. pro parameter and topology files for NMR structure calculations in XPLOR (Brunger 1992), and the newer, now default, version, protein-3.1, where nonbonded parameters have been updated and the atomic radii have been modified to those of Molprobity, to provide a more realistic representation of atomic radii and improve nonbonded repulsions (Bermejo et al 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure was recalculated here using Xplor-NIH 2.42, with a modified van der Waal radius of 1.10 (up from 0.9) (61). An initial 100 structures were calculated starting from an extended single strand, using NOE, hydrogen bond, weak planarity (weight = 300.0 for individual base and weight = 6.0 for base pairs), and dihedral angle restraints (21,60).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of mdP2ab was calculated from an extended unfolded RNA using 802 NOEs and 459 dihedral angle restraints following standard Xplor protocols as described previously (31) but modified to use the updated NIH-Xplor 2.42 (56). The 200 lowest-energy structures were further refined with 95 RDCs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%