2009
DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000350630.57549.70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Neonatal Outcome Through Practical Shoulder Dystocia Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also published papers from the specialty of obstetrics and gynecology that report improved outcomes in neonates, however, they share some of the same limitations as those from surgical specialties [75][76][77] .…”
Section: Does Simulator Training Lead To Improved Patient Outcomes Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also published papers from the specialty of obstetrics and gynecology that report improved outcomes in neonates, however, they share some of the same limitations as those from surgical specialties [75][76][77] .…”
Section: Does Simulator Training Lead To Improved Patient Outcomes Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the important differences in the training between these programmes was the training model used. The Bristol group [47,80] employed the PROMPT trainer that had been demonstrated to have advantages for training in a randomised trial of training for SD [31,81], whereas the Oxford group did not [18]. It is not clear what mannequins were employed in the other studies.…”
Section: Myth 7: All Training Models and Mannequins Are Usefulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same Bristol-based investigators also assessed the impact of shoulder dystocia drills; standardized procedures and checklists included in these training exercises improved physician practices and skill retention for up to 1 year [143][144][145]. A before-and-after comparison associated shoulder dystocia drills with reduced risk of neonatal injury and brachial plexus injury at birth (RR 0.25; 95% CI, 0.11-0.57 and RR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.72, respectively) [146].…”
Section: Evidence For In-service Training Obstetric Simulations and mentioning
confidence: 99%