2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving molecular radiotherapy dosimetry using anthropomorphic calibration

Abstract: The optimised delivery of Molecular Radiotherapy requires individualised calculation of absorbed dose to both targeted lesions and neighbouring healthy tissue. To achieve this, accurate quantification of the activity distribution in the patient by external detection is vital. Methods: This work extends specific anatomy-related calibration to true organ shapes. A set of patient-specific 3D printed organ inserts based on a diagnostic CT scan was produced, comprising the liver, spleen and both kidneys. The insert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values for the kidney (0.60 ± 0.01) and spleen inserts (0.61 ± 0.01) agree (within measurement uncertainties) with values reported by [ 25 ] for kidney and spleen inserts corresponding to mathematical models from [ 37 ] for measurements with a GE system. The values for the kidney inserts also agree with the values reported in [ 36 ] for patient-specific inserts based on CT imaging. A similar trend in activity recovery for 177 Lu in kidney phantom inserts corresponding to models from [ 38 ] is reported in [ 24 ] for measurements with a Siemens system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values for the kidney (0.60 ± 0.01) and spleen inserts (0.61 ± 0.01) agree (within measurement uncertainties) with values reported by [ 25 ] for kidney and spleen inserts corresponding to mathematical models from [ 37 ] for measurements with a GE system. The values for the kidney inserts also agree with the values reported in [ 36 ] for patient-specific inserts based on CT imaging. A similar trend in activity recovery for 177 Lu in kidney phantom inserts corresponding to models from [ 38 ] is reported in [ 24 ] for measurements with a Siemens system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The data for kidney and spleen obtained without resolution recovery in case of S4 allows a direct comparison with theoretical and experimental activity recovery values reported in previous work [ 24 , 25 , 36 ]. The values for the kidney (0.60 ± 0.01) and spleen inserts (0.61 ± 0.01) agree (within measurement uncertainties) with values reported by [ 25 ] for kidney and spleen inserts corresponding to mathematical models from [ 37 ] for measurements with a GE system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The dashed lines are added to guide the eye and do not indicate a continuity of data. The central Cristy and Eckerman (C&E) spleen data are from Robinson et al [4] and the patient spleen data are from Price et al [5].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inserts were mounted centrally and then radially displaced in an elliptical Jaszczak phantom apart from the patient spleen in its anatomical position which was mounted in a large elliptical phantom designed to mimic a patient body [5]. Figure 1 shows the positions of the inserts in the phantoms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using global calibration factors, validation measurements or dosimetry audits as required for external beam radiotherapy trials [ 33 ] will become more important. Those measurements range from simple sensitivity measurements to semi- or full-anthropomorphic phantoms [ 34 36 ] or testing of the full dosimetry chain [ 24 ]. In the present study, reconstructions are performed locally at the participating centres, which reduces the impact on the central dosimetry hub, but might increase site-dependent biases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%