Improving mobile health apps usage: a quantitative study on mPower data of Parkinson's disease

Abstract

PurposeThe emergence of mobile health (mHealth) products has created a capability of monitoring and managing the health of patients with chronic diseases. These mHealth technologies would not be beneficial unless they are adopted and used by their target users. This study identifies key factors affecting the usage of mHealth apps based on user usage data collected from an mHealth app.Design/methodology/approachUsing a dataset collected from an mHealth app named mPower, developed for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), this paper investigated the effects of disease diagnosis, disease progression and mHealth app difficulty level on app usage, while controlling for user information. App usage is measured by five different activity counts of the app.FindingsThe results across five measures of mHealth app usage vary slightly. On average, previous professional diagnosis and high user performance scores encourage user participation and engagement, while disease progression hinders app usage.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings potentially provide insights into better design and promotion of mHealth products and improve the capability of health management of patients with chronic diseases.Originality/valueStudies on the mHealth app usage are critical but sparse because large-scale and reliable mHealth app usage data are limited. Unlike earlier works based solely on survey data, this research used a large user usage data collected from an mHealth app to study key factors affecting app usage. The methods presented in this study can serve as a pioneering work for the design and promotion of mHealth technologies.

A review of challenges and opportunities of blockchain adoption for operational excellence in the UK automotive industry

“…Largely, the TOE framework has Kouhizadeh et al (2021) who used the TOE framework approach to explore the challenges and as a whole beyond the individual perspective. Though this approach differs from the work of level (Li and Chang, 2020;Patil et al 2020). TOE framework takes a view of the organisation their basis to study the challenges and opportunities of technology adoption at the individual Previous studies have used various technology adoption theories such as TAM, UTAUT etc as facilitators, importantly, these include environment or government regulatory, infrastructures human capital size; and environment context refers to certain operational inhibitors and describes top management, the resources of the firm such internal tool and specialisation, represents the availability and the features of technological innovation; organisation context 1 5 that include technology support by connecting to technology consultants in quality ICT.…”

“…Moreover, hydroelectric dams in required to manage one Bitcoin transaction is equal to that required to power nine households to Siegfried et al (2020) andO' Leary (2018). Similarly, it has been reported that the energy 2020a) has been compared to the electricity consumption in the country of Ireland according a consensus algorithm (Nakamoto, 2008), the energy that Bitcoin consumes (Chang et al 2020;Min, 2019). Since blockchain technology underpins bitcoins and uses Proof of Work as as an extent of computing resources and energy consumption (O'Leary, 2017; Kumar et al…”

“…In their book, technology context represents the availability and the features of technological innovation, organisation context describes top management, the resources of the firm such internal tool and specialisation, human capital size and environment context refers to certain operational inhibitors and facilitators, importantly, these include environment or government regulatory, infrastructures that include technology support by connecting to technology consultants in quality ICT. Previous studies have used various technology adoption theories such as technology acceptance model (TAM) and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT), as their basis to study the challenges and opportunities of technology adoption at the individual level (Li and Chang, 2020;Patil et al, 2020). TOE framework takes a view of the organisation as a whole beyond the individual perspective.…”

Use Intention of Aggregator Medical Mobile Apps’ (M-apps) and Revealing Reasons for Non-Use

“…Recently, and more specifically, healthcare m-apps (sometimes called mHealth apps) have attracted the interest of researchers and practitioners from various disciplines, representing a relatively new area (Li and Chang, 2020) that has implications on the micro (patients and healthcare providers) and on the macro level (healthcare industry and the economy) (Mansour, 2017).…”

“…2-2-1-1 Perceived Ease of Use Generally, a new technology will have no value if not adopted by its target users (Li and Chang, 2020). Clearly, it is adopted if an individual perceives its benefits (Vahdat et al, 2020).…”