2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving microalgae for biotechnology — From genetics to synthetic biology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical mutagens involve different kinds of irradiation such as UV, γ, and heavy ion beams. Due to easy implementation, UV has been known to be the most widely applied physical mutagen (Hlavova et al, 2015;Yi et al, 2015). UV light has strong genotoxic effect which induces DNA damage such as the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine pyrimidone photoproducts (64 PPs) (Ikehata and Ono, 2011).…”
Section: Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical mutagens involve different kinds of irradiation such as UV, γ, and heavy ion beams. Due to easy implementation, UV has been known to be the most widely applied physical mutagen (Hlavova et al, 2015;Yi et al, 2015). UV light has strong genotoxic effect which induces DNA damage such as the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine pyrimidone photoproducts (64 PPs) (Ikehata and Ono, 2011).…”
Section: Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, generation of loss‐of‐function mutants by random insertional or chemical mutagenesis, despite being an excellent strategy to screen for new loci underlying a particular function, is unable to probe gene function in a direct and targeted manner; moreover, diploid organisms with unknown sexual cycles can be difficult to tackle using this approach (Parker et al ., ). These limitations have greatly hindered hypothesis‐driven testing of gene and pathway functions, and impeded rational strain development in oleaginous microalgae (Hlavova et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More precise genome editing tools such as zinc-finger nuclease (ZFN), transcription activator-like effectors (TALEs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) have also been developed for gene activation, deletion and replacement in organisms as emerging technology. However, only a limited number of studies have been reported on engineering microalgae through these advanced genome editing tools, for example, ZFN-mediated gene editing in the green microalga C. reinhardtii and the use of TALEs in the marine diatom P. tricornutum [54]. It was reported that using CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted gene modification in C. reinhardtii succeeded with an expression of Cas9 and single guide RNA (sgRNA) genes while the study suggested the failure to recover transformants of C. reinhardtii was caused by the toxicity of Cas9 produced constitutively following gene editing [55].…”
Section: Approaches For Developing Algal Cell Factoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%