2010
DOI: 10.1331/japha.2010.09043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving medication therapy management through collaborative hospice care in rural Minnesota

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this time, a variety of MTM practices exist in Minnesota, from urban clinic-based pharmacists who work with physicians to identify patients who may benefit from the service to pharmacists in rural community practice who assist in the management of hospice patient medication therapy. 9 This study has outlined some of the basic characteristics of current MTM services and practitioners in Minnesota. In a "typical" practice, the practitioner is most likely to conduct five face-to-face patient visits per week involving a comprehensive medication review and resulting in recommendations to improve health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, a variety of MTM practices exist in Minnesota, from urban clinic-based pharmacists who work with physicians to identify patients who may benefit from the service to pharmacists in rural community practice who assist in the management of hospice patient medication therapy. 9 This study has outlined some of the basic characteristics of current MTM services and practitioners in Minnesota. In a "typical" practice, the practitioner is most likely to conduct five face-to-face patient visits per week involving a comprehensive medication review and resulting in recommendations to improve health outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Administrative involvement percentage tended to be greater in freestanding hospices in comparison to hospital-based, home health agency-based, or nursing home-based hospices (26%, 21%, 19%, 22%, respectively; P ¼ .027). Hospices operational for 6 to 10 years tended to demonstrate greater pharmacist clinical involvement than those operational less than 6 years or more than 10 years (22% [0-5], 30% [6][7][8][9][10], 18% [11][12][13][14][15], 22% [16][17][18][19][20] Hospices affiliated with a school of pharmacy also showed significantly increased administrative involvement (38% vs 23%; P < .001) and less dispensing involvement (17% vs 38%; P < .001) versus those without affiliation. Likewise, hospices that provide patient care at their own freestanding inpatient and residential facilities were significantly associated with increased administrative and decreased dispensing pharmacist involvement (29% vs 22%; P < .006 and 31% vs 39%; P < .02, respectively) versus hospices that do not.…”
Section: Administrator Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 25 years of hospice growth, the scope of pharmacist services in hospice care has been extensively characterized. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Formally, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists has defined the role of the hospice and palliative care pharmacist in a consensus statement. 17 The types of services provided by hospice pharmacists can be broadly generalized as distribution/dispensing, consultation/clinical, and administrative services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] Several authors have described the implementation of CMM services. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] However, to our knowledge, no study has presented a theoretical structure that can serve as a guide for planning and implementing CMM in different healthcare settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%