2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving meat cutters' work: Changes and effects following an intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The other three groups produced written overviews of each area and possible development opportunities that could most likely contribute to diminishing the addressed problems of the industry. In the subsequent phases, these opportunities were the foundation for a number of detailed studies, including Vogel et al (2013Vogel et al ( , 2015 and Karltun et al (2016).…”
Section: Application Of the Hto Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other three groups produced written overviews of each area and possible development opportunities that could most likely contribute to diminishing the addressed problems of the industry. In the subsequent phases, these opportunities were the foundation for a number of detailed studies, including Vogel et al (2013Vogel et al ( , 2015 and Karltun et al (2016).…”
Section: Application Of the Hto Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, meat processing industry has been repetitively identified as a high risk environment for the CTS, as it typically requires significant exposure to repetitive hand movements to hang, kill, clean, eviscerate, cut, package and box meat at a rapid pace and at relatively low environmental temperature [6,[21][22][23]. Not coincidentally, the CTS prevalence in meat industry has been reported to be 15-24% [2,3,10,[18][19][20][23][24][25][26][27], and some reports suggest that even higher estimates may be found depending on the operative definition applied by researchers [20,21,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in this study, there was a large increase in productivity by 140% (Table 3). Vogel et al (2013) found a reduction in MSs and sick leave after process innovation (job rotation) in meat cutting. Similarly, this study found a reduction in discomfort (e.g.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Ergonomics Studies In Process Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 96%