2014
DOI: 10.1118/1.4885995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving mass candidate detection in mammograms via feature maxima propagation and local feature selection

Abstract: Given the improved detection performance, the authors believe that the strategies proposed in this paper can render mass candidate detection approaches based on image location classification more robust to feature discrepancies and prove advantageous not only at the candidate detection level, but also at subsequent steps of a CAD system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Texture is one of the major mammographic characteristics for mass classification. For instance, several studies have used texture analysis methods to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissue [3][4][5][6][7][8] or to discriminate between benign and malignant masses [9][10][11]. Table 1 briefly summarizes some of this previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Texture is one of the major mammographic characteristics for mass classification. For instance, several studies have used texture analysis methods to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissue [3][4][5][6][7][8] or to discriminate between benign and malignant masses [9][10][11]. Table 1 briefly summarizes some of this previous work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are presented by Fonseca in 2013 (40), who revealed accuracies of 52.73% for dense and 51.60% for fatty tissue; and Melendez (48) who increased the mean sensitivity from 0.926 to 0.948 on detecting breast lesions by using RF. …”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%