Fourth IEEE Region 10 International Conference TENCON
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.1989.176921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving list comprehension database queries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many programming languages provide a comprehension notation offering operations over lists analogous to those provided by SQL over tables (Trinder and Wadler 1989;Buneman et al 1994). F# also supports a form of comprehension notation called computation expressions (Petricek and Syme 2012).…”
Section: Comprehensions and Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many programming languages provide a comprehension notation offering operations over lists analogous to those provided by SQL over tables (Trinder and Wadler 1989;Buneman et al 1994). F# also supports a form of comprehension notation called computation expressions (Petricek and Syme 2012).…”
Section: Comprehensions and Queriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trinder and Wadler (Trinder and Wadler 1989) demonstrate how query optimization based on relational algebra identities can be performed by corresponding transformations on queries in list comprehension form. Consider the query…”
Section: Algebraic Optimizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mixing is not possible for monad comprehensions, since they restrict the inputs and the output of a comprehension to be of the same type. Monad comprehensions were first proposed as a convenient database language by Trinder and Wadler [1989]; Trinder [1991];and Chan and Trinder [1994], who also presented many algebraic transformations over these forms, as well as methods for converting comprehensions into joins. The monad comprehension syntax was also adopted by Buneman et al [1994] as an alternative syntax to monoid homomorphisms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%