2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2530811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Large Scale Day-Ahead Security Constrained Unit Commitment Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With (25) and (26), the minimum approximation error ε 0 * can be easily obtained. Theorem 2: essentially gives an analytical solution to problems (20) and (21). So, the solution time for solving this problem is negligible.…”
Section: Calculation Of Approximation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With (25) and (26), the minimum approximation error ε 0 * can be easily obtained. Theorem 2: essentially gives an analytical solution to problems (20) and (21). So, the solution time for solving this problem is negligible.…”
Section: Calculation Of Approximation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2: As analysed in Remark 1, ε l j 1 , j 2 must be repeatedly calculated during the whole procedure. With the analytical solution to problems (20) and (21) given in Theorem 1, the calculation time of ε l j 1 , j 2 can be negligible. Remark 3: Although not stated in the algorithm, it is better to eliminate the redundant transmission constraints previously before running Algorithm 1 (see Fig.…”
Section: Algorithmic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is a challenge to model the full network model for large-scale power systems for both pre-and post-contingency states and have it solved within the required time window. As reported in [15], the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) manages a system with about 45,000 buses. In order to meet the market clearing time requirements, MISO employs a 1200 seconds time limit and a 0.1% MIP relative gap for the day-ahead (DA) SCUC.…”
Section: Industry Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to meet the market clearing time requirements, MISO employs a 1200 seconds time limit and a 0.1% MIP relative gap for the day-ahead (DA) SCUC. As stated in [15], MISO constantly encounters performance challenges in solving its DA SCUC model with the aforementioned limits; thus, expanding the model in order to explicitly represent contingency scenarios within the model would be computationally burdensome. Therefore, in order to address the performance challenges that arise from large-scale systems, the ISOs in the United States currently rely on heuristics, approximations, and policies rather than solving stochastic programs.…”
Section: Industry Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%