2022
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13010098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Land Use/Cover Classification Accuracy from Random Forest Feature Importance Selection Based on Synergistic Use of Sentinel Data and Digital Elevation Model in Agriculturally Dominated Landscape

Abstract: Land use and land cover (LULC) mapping can be of great help in changing land use decisions, but accurate mapping of LULC categories is challenging, especially in semi-arid areas with extensive farming systems and seasonal vegetation phenology. Machine learning algorithms are now widely used for LULC mapping because they provide analytical capabilities for LULC classification. However, the use of machine learning algorithms to improve classification performance is still being explored. The objective of this stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Starting with the field survey, Adrian et al, [63] labelled thirteen crops, including urban, water, and soil, with the help of field data and WorldView-3 (WV3) images; Wang et al, [64] also conducted the field survey; Solórzano et al, [50] created ten land cover features by using Sentinel-2 images, Planet images, VHR (Very High Resolution) images from google earth and also conducted the field survey. Priyatna et al, [65] labelled ten classes with the help of Landsat-8 image, and Ibrahim et al, [1] created eight land cover features by using RGB Composite images and google earth images.The authors of the papers [25,61,66,67] and [68] did not specify the source of their ground-truth data and did not go into great detail about land cover aspects.…”
Section: Data Annotation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Starting with the field survey, Adrian et al, [63] labelled thirteen crops, including urban, water, and soil, with the help of field data and WorldView-3 (WV3) images; Wang et al, [64] also conducted the field survey; Solórzano et al, [50] created ten land cover features by using Sentinel-2 images, Planet images, VHR (Very High Resolution) images from google earth and also conducted the field survey. Priyatna et al, [65] labelled ten classes with the help of Landsat-8 image, and Ibrahim et al, [1] created eight land cover features by using RGB Composite images and google earth images.The authors of the papers [25,61,66,67] and [68] did not specify the source of their ground-truth data and did not go into great detail about land cover aspects.…”
Section: Data Annotation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the SAR image has a reasonable spatial resolution, land cover features can be improved and increased for this investigation, even though the model performed well in its application.Table 2 also discussed the Deep Learning or Machine learning techniques applied to SAR and Optical images. The authors of the papers [1,25,32] integrated SAR and Optical images for land cover classification using the Random Forest algorithm. Song et al, [28] used U-Net for classifying seven land cover features.…”
Section: Classification Of Sar Images Using Deep Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Yang et al [19], the random forest (RF) [20] algorithm has been widely utilized in previous LULC studies [16,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], followed by support vector machine (SVM) [30][31][32][33][34][35]. Li et al [36] conducted a comparison between the performance of the RF classification algorithm and other algorithms such as SVM and artificial neural network (ANN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%