2005
DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.5.609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Informed Consent and Enhancing Recruitment for Research by Understanding Economic Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some commentators believe that the act of paying research subjects is wrong (7), maybe even coercive, while others find it an acceptable and perhaps necessary part of recruitment for clinical investigation (8,9); others see payment of at least healthy subjects as fair and appropriate (10,11). In addition, only minimal guidance exists to help investigators determine whether or how much to pay participants in a particular study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some commentators believe that the act of paying research subjects is wrong (7), maybe even coercive, while others find it an acceptable and perhaps necessary part of recruitment for clinical investigation (8,9); others see payment of at least healthy subjects as fair and appropriate (10,11). In addition, only minimal guidance exists to help investigators determine whether or how much to pay participants in a particular study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As other community research has found, incentives can serve as leverage with those living in poverty in the DTES, making it difficult for individuals to refuse to participate in research even where ethical concerns exist (Damon et al, 2017). This type of inducement runs counter to conventional research ethics guidelines (Dunn & Gordon, 2005;Medical Research Council of Canada, 1987;Ripley, 2006), which assert that financial gain should not be a primary motivation for participation in research. These findings speak to the need to address economic deprivation among this population, alongside ensuring research results in material improvements for marginalized communities.…”
Section: "Where Does All This Information Go?" the Practice Of (Un)inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disagreement exists regarding the ethicality of offering an incentive to research participants, with some scholars decrying its use and others viewing it as appropriate in at least some circumstances (31)(32)(33)(34). Concern has been voiced, in particular, that an incentive could be coercive, that is, threaten the individual with physical, psychological, or social harm in order to compel her to do something, or that the incentive could serve as an undue inducement by being so attractive that potential participants might ignore potential risks associated with participation or be unable to exercise proper judgment as a result (1,35,36).…”
Section: Incentive Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%