2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2009.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving information security awareness and behaviour through dialogue, participation and collective reflection. An intervention study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted by Safa et al uses these aspects to reveal the influences of involvement on employees' attitude towards compliance with information security policies (ISP) [28]. Results show that information security knowledge sharing [12,33], collaboration [37], intervention [3,24], and information security experience [27] all have significant effects on an individuals' attitudes towards information security compliance with ISP.…”
Section: Involvement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted by Safa et al uses these aspects to reveal the influences of involvement on employees' attitude towards compliance with information security policies (ISP) [28]. Results show that information security knowledge sharing [12,33], collaboration [37], intervention [3,24], and information security experience [27] all have significant effects on an individuals' attitudes towards information security compliance with ISP.…”
Section: Involvement Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much effort devoted to training users in organizations to be more secure, and some researchers have investigated the effects of different kinds of training programs and security policies on security outcomes [4,11]. Microsoft has an extensive online resource for teaching users all about computer security [1].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They must be persuaded of a threat to their interests and that their action might be effective against it (Herath and Rao, 2009;Besnard and Arief, 2004;Siponen, 2000;Al-Awadi, 2009;Fulford and Doherty, 2003). To enable this, policies must be the product of dialogue rather than artefacts of diktat (Albrechtsen, 2007;Albrechtsen and Hovden, 2010;Gagn e et al, 2008).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 96%