Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures

Abstract

The author suggests that we apply recent research knowledge to improve our conceptualization, measures, and methodology for studying the effects of teachers’ professional development on teachers and students. She makes the case that there is a research consensus to support the use of a set of core features and a common conceptual framework in professional development impact studies. She urges us to move away from automatic biases either for or against observation, interviews, or surveys in such studies. She argues that the use of a common conceptual framework would elevate the quality of professional development studies and subsequently the general understanding of how best to shape and implement teacher learning opportunities for the maximum benefit of both teachers and students.

É possível relacionar avaliação discente e formação de professores? A experiência de São Paulo

“…Diversos autores apontam que essas ações de formação e desenvolvimento profissional têm sido colocadas no cerne das reformas educacionais (DESIMONE, 2009;GATTI, 2008;BORKO, 2004;AGUERRONDO, 2002;GARET;PORTER;GUSKEY, 2001;WILSON;BERNE, 1999;SPARKS, 1991;.…”

Professional development of teacher-educators towards transformative learning

“…Here too, however, there is a lack of a thorough evidence base for the specific features of professional development interventions (Desmione, 2009;Van Veen, Zwart, Meirink, & Verloop, 2010;Vermunt & Endedijk, 2011). Generic characteristics related to effective professional development interventions were found, however (Van Veen et al, 2010).…”

Teachers and didacticians: key stakeholders in the processes of developing mathematics teaching

“…It has been recognized that developing high quality teachers and effective teaching are crucial for improving students' achievement in mathematics (National Mathematics Advisory Panel 2008;Sowder 2007 Some studies (e.g., Archibald, Coggshall, Croft, and Goe 2011;Desimone 2009) have explored the relationship between PD program and student performance in mathematics, suggesting that an effective PD programme should include the following characteristics, which combine elements of Simon's two categories:…”