2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab2920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving IGM temperature constraints using wavelet analysis on high-redshift quasars

Abstract: The thermal state of the intergalactic medium (IGM) contains vital information about the epoch of reionization, one of the most transformative yet poorly understood periods in the young universe. This thermal state is encoded in the small-scale structure of Lyman-α (Lyα) absorption in quasar spectra. The 1D flux power spectrum measures the average small-scale structure along quasar sightlines. At high redshifts, where the opacity is large, averaging mixes high signal-to-noise ratio transmission spikes with noi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where σ obs is the reported observational uncertainty in the flux power spectrum or helium opacity, respectively. In their study, Wolfson et al (2021) showed the importance of using the covariance matrix when inferring the temperature of the IGM from measurements of the Lyα power spectrum and wavelet statistics. For our MCMC analysis we use the covariance matrices of P(k) in the likelihood calculation (see Section 2.9).…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where σ obs is the reported observational uncertainty in the flux power spectrum or helium opacity, respectively. In their study, Wolfson et al (2021) showed the importance of using the covariance matrix when inferring the temperature of the IGM from measurements of the Lyα power spectrum and wavelet statistics. For our MCMC analysis we use the covariance matrices of P(k) in the likelihood calculation (see Section 2.9).…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the accuracy of their numerical CWTs can be verified by the corresponding analytical results. Finally, it should be noted that the CWT for 1D signals is not trivial in astrophysics and cosmology, as it is also applicable to a wide range of scenarios, such as analyzing the light curves of astronomical sources (e.g., Tarnopolski et al 2020;Ren et al 2022), subtracting the foreground emission from the 21 cm signal (e.g., Gu et al 2013;Li et al 2019), measuring the smallscale structure in the Lyman-α forest (e.g., Lidz et al 2010;Garzilli et al 2012;Wolfson et al 2021), investigating the time-frequency properties of the gravitational waves (e.g., Tary et al 2018), characterizing the 1D density fields (e.g., da Cunha et al 2018;Wang & He 2021;, and so on. We publicly release the Fortran 95 implementation of the fast CWT algorithms described in this manuscript 1 , in the hope that the community will use them to perform wavelet analysis of 1D signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ly𝛼 forest is thus used as the premier probe of the IGM thermal history. Various statistical properties of the Ly𝛼 forest are used to measure the IGM thermal state, including the power spectrum Zaldarriaga et al 2001;McDonald et al 2001;Walther et al 2017;Walther et al 2018;Khaire et al 2019;Gaikwad et al 2021), the flux probability density function (PDF) (Bolton et al 2008;Viel et al 2009;Lee et al 2015), the transmission curvature (Becker et al 2011;Boera et al 2014), the wavelet decomposition of the forest (Theuns & Zaroubi 2000;Theuns et al 2002;Lidz et al 2010;Garzilli et al 2012;Wolfson et al 2021), and the quasar pair phase angle distribution (Rorai et al 2013(Rorai et al , 2017. These measurements are typically performed using Ly𝛼 forest spectra from groundbased telescopes at 𝑧 > 1.6, where the Ly𝛼 transition lies above the atmospheric cutoff (𝜆 ∼ 3300Å), explaining why there are currently very few measurements of the IGM thermal state at redshift below such limit (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%