2010 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop 2010
DOI: 10.1109/slt.2010.5700823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving hmm-based extractive summarization for multi-domain contact center dialogues

Abstract: This paper reports the improvements we made to our previously proposed hidden Markov model (HMM) based summarization method for multi-domain contact center dialogues. Since the method relied on Viterbi decoding for selecting utterances to include in a summary, it had the inability to control compression rates. We enhance our method by using the forward-backward algorithm together with integer linear programming (ILP) to enable the control of compression rates, realizing summaries that contain as many domain-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is quite interesting to note that while a lot of work has been in the area of financial text processing, only a few of them ( [11] and [4]) tried to understand the intent behind inbound calls specific to the financial domain. Moreover, none of them performed abstracting summarization followed by hierarchical clustering and classification of customer calls related to the financial domain to analyse the reasons and motivators behind these calls.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite interesting to note that while a lot of work has been in the area of financial text processing, only a few of them ( [11] and [4]) tried to understand the intent behind inbound calls specific to the financial domain. Moreover, none of them performed abstracting summarization followed by hierarchical clustering and classification of customer calls related to the financial domain to analyse the reasons and motivators behind these calls.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many text summarization studies in recent years formulate text summarization as the maximum coverage problem (Filatova and Hatzivassiloglou, 2004;Yih et al, 2007;Takamura and Okumura, 2009;Gillick and Favre, 2009;Nishikawa et al, 2010;Higashinaka et al, 2010). The maximum coverage model, based on the maximum coverage problem, generates a summary by selecting sentences to cover as many information units (such as unigrams and bigrams) as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%