2021
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe848116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Health Professions Students’ Understanding of Interprofessional Roles Through Participation in a Patient Stabilization Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a traditional pretest-posttest (TPP) design rather than a retrospective pretest-posttest (RPP) design so that student attitudes about IPE could be directly compared among student groups prior to their participation in the first IPE activity. Other studies have used the TPP design with SPICE-R2 for a similar purpose (Brennan et al, 2021). The TPP design is limited by the potential for response shift bias due to lack of self-awareness or understanding of constructs at pretest, socially desired responding, and retest effects (Little et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a traditional pretest-posttest (TPP) design rather than a retrospective pretest-posttest (RPP) design so that student attitudes about IPE could be directly compared among student groups prior to their participation in the first IPE activity. Other studies have used the TPP design with SPICE-R2 for a similar purpose (Brennan et al, 2021). The TPP design is limited by the potential for response shift bias due to lack of self-awareness or understanding of constructs at pretest, socially desired responding, and retest effects (Little et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,9 An assortment of assessment tools and research methodologies have been used to measure IPE learning outcomes. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In 2017, Schrader et al completed a systematic review of quantitative assessment tools published in the literature and their overall usefulness in pharmacy education; however, qualitative and/or mixed method assessments were not reviewed. 10 The reviewed assessment tools were mapped to the expanded Kirkpatrick outcomes model, which is a commonly described model in healthcare education literature for categorizing levels of learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Assessments of IPE using quantitative tools, within both pharmacy and student prescriber literature, have generally included either direct observation of student performance and/or student self-assessment. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The IOM Committee on Measuring the Impact of Interprofessional Education on Collaborative Practice and Patient Outcomes has recommended the use of assessments that employ mixed methods to gain a more robust understanding of the way learning occurs in IPE. 5 McLaughlin, et al previously discussed the potential value of using mixed method studies in pharmacy education, including experiential education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Interprofessional education has been shown to benefit health care students in improving communication and teamwork skills and for achieving a greater understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the other members of the team. [25][26][27] Use of Sim-IPE has been found to be effective in increasing student readiness for future interprofessional collaboration. 28 It is important for future health care providers to understand the importance of an interprofessional approach to critical care and EM for patient safety and improved outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%