2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving genomic prediction of growth and wood traits in Eucalyptus using phenotypes from non-genotyped trees by single-step GBLUP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), GBLUP and ABLUP models to estimate genetic parameters and to test the prediction accuracies of different traits in an E. pellita breeding population. Most of the previous studies in forest trees which used ssGBLUP have included only the additive effects in the model ( Ratcliffe et al 2017 ; Cappa et al 2017 , 2019 ; Klápšte et al 2018 ). In contrast, we used additive and dominance effects in ssGBLUP model to study the genetic parameters and to test prediction accuracies of different traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we used single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP), GBLUP and ABLUP models to estimate genetic parameters and to test the prediction accuracies of different traits in an E. pellita breeding population. Most of the previous studies in forest trees which used ssGBLUP have included only the additive effects in the model ( Ratcliffe et al 2017 ; Cappa et al 2017 , 2019 ; Klápšte et al 2018 ). In contrast, we used additive and dominance effects in ssGBLUP model to study the genetic parameters and to test prediction accuracies of different traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, there are many studies using the ssGBLUP in animal breeding there are only a few such studies in forest trees ( Ratcliffe et al 2017 ; Cappa et al 2017 , 2019 ; Klápšte et al 2018 ). In one of the first studies to implement this method in tree breeding, Cappa et al (2017) found increased accuracies of breeding values with the ssGBLUP compared to pedigree-based ABLUP method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, for the Eucalyptus genus, the use of RADseq-derived methods is scarce. To date, the easy access to the commercial SNP array (EUChip60K) has led researchers to use it in the analysis of the genus [41][42][43][44], rather than RADseq-derived methods. Some species are poorly or less frequently represented in this chip than E. grandis (which is represented for its economic importance), and for this reason, the population allele frequencies and genetic relationships between individuals can be affected [45][46][47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of molecular marker data for implementing predictive breeding methods to support the development of new and improved varieties has strongly increased during recent years (Haikka et al., 2020; Juliana et al., 2019; Schrag, Schipprack, & Melchinger, 2019), as such a strategy can result in higher selection gains than those possible by relying merely on observed phenotypic performance of quantitatively inherited traits like yield (Rife, Graybosch, & Poland, 2018; Sleper et al., 2020). Aside from introducing genomic relationships into various prediction models, the possibility to utilize relationships based on pedigree records has been the subject of past (Bauer, Reetz, & Léon, 2006) and more recent investigations (Cappa et al., 2019). The efficiency of both pedigree and genomic selection is, amongst others, dependant on the heritability of the trait of interest as well as the availability of correlated traits that can be exploited in a pedigree‐assisted or genomic‐assisted prediction in order to increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values (Schulthess, Zhao, Longin, & Reif, 2018; Velazco, Jordan, et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%