2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39924-7_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Generic Non-contiguous File Access for MPI-IO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be shown that listless I/O is prepared to perform well for all cases of non-contiguous I/O. In a companion paper [17], we have shown that listless I/O is also effective on scalar cluster architectures, increasing the bandwidth about one order of magnitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It could be shown that listless I/O is prepared to perform well for all cases of non-contiguous I/O. In a companion paper [17], we have shown that listless I/O is also effective on scalar cluster architectures, increasing the bandwidth about one order of magnitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although originally designed to take advantage of the hardware support for gather-scatter operations, flattening-on-the-fly has been extended to be efficient on scalar architectures, too, by better exploiting data locality. This is borne out by the implementation of listless-io for PC architectures described in [17].…”
Section: Flattening On the Flymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After declaring a view on a file, a process may see and access non-contiguous regions of the file in a contiguous manner. In [21], a new datatype handling functionality is introduced. It improves noncontiguous data access management, with the result of increasing the data throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating on the datatypes directly instead of "flattening" the datatypes or entire accesses into offset/length pairs can also ease memory requirements of representing and storing data layout descriptions [16]. There is a threshold where storing datatypes does require more memory than storing the flat offset/length pairs representing the datatypes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%