2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41827-3_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Gender Classification Accuracy in the Wild

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we focus on gender recognition in challenging large scale scenarios. Firstly, we review the literature results achieved for the problem in large datasets, and select the currently hardest dataset: The Images of Groups. Secondly, we study the extraction of features from the face and its local context to improve the recognition accuracy. Different descriptors, resolutions and classifiers are studied, overcoming previous literature results, reaching an accuracy of 89.8%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reader must observe that these results were achieved not following a lights-out, black-box testing methodology. Focusing on GROUPS, with the exception of the protocol described by Dago et al [9], used in [4] too, the adopted protocols are not easily reproducible. The fact that GROUPS is currently the most challenging in the wild dataset, has convinced us to focus on this dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reader must observe that these results were achieved not following a lights-out, black-box testing methodology. Focusing on GROUPS, with the exception of the protocol described by Dago et al [9], used in [4] too, the adopted protocols are not easily reproducible. The fact that GROUPS is currently the most challenging in the wild dataset, has convinced us to focus on this dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent results support the approach described in this paper. On the one hand, the extraction of features at different scales may benefit the GC performance [2,4]. In [4] the features are extracted from the face and its local context, thus, the face is analyzed at different resolutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are analyzed in the range [1,8] and [1,6], i.e. analyzing grid from 1 × 1 to 8 × 6 cells, making a total of 6 × 48 = 288 variants.…”
Section: Single Descriptors Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this problem, this effect is added to the proven accuracy improvement as claimed in [8] and the reduction of ambiguous cases occurrences in [10].…”
Section: Score Level Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation