2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Functional MRI Registration Using Whole-Brain Functional Correlation Tensors

Abstract: Population studies of brain function with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) largely rely on the accurate inter-subject registration of functional areas. This is typically achieved through registration of the corresponding T1-weighted MR images with more structural details. However, accumulating evidence has suggested that such strategy cannot well-align functional regions which are not necessarily confined by the anatomical boundaries defined by the T1-weighted MR images. To mitigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Code availability Patch-based Functional Correlation Tensor code can be retrieved from: https:// github. com/ zyjsh mily/ ts-PFCTs (Zhou et al 2017).…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Code availability Patch-based Functional Correlation Tensor code can be retrieved from: https:// github. com/ zyjsh mily/ ts-PFCTs (Zhou et al 2017).…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have claimed that task-based methods rely on the implausible assumption that different people's brains are performing the same functions at precisely the same times (Jiang et al [2013]). They argue that we ought instead to use resting-state fMRI to build a functional connectivity profile for each subject and then find transformations that bring the individual connectivity patterns into alignment (Jiang et al [2013]; Zhou et al [2017]; Nenning et al [2017]; Chen et al [2017]). I am somewhat skeptical of these methods, partly because I share others' doubts about what resting-state fMRI really tells us (Buckner et al [2013]; McCaffrey and Danks [forthcoming]), and partly because functional connectivity-based methods are meant to be generalpurpose.…”
Section: Functional Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, no gold standard for evaluating the fMRI registration performance exists. Most previous fMRI registration methods (Khullar et al 2011, Jiang et al 2013, Zhou et al 2017, 2018 use the group-level statistical maps of resting-state brain functional networks for validation. The evaluation criterion is to maximize the correlation in resting-state brain functional networks across the testing dataset.…”
Section: Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%