2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving fluorescence imaging of biological cells on biomedical polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus though, optical detection of NFC hydrogel with light microscopy may be limited due to light scattering. Lack of autofluorescence allows fluorescence spectroscopy based imaging with low background unlike with other biomaterial scaffolds [28].…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus though, optical detection of NFC hydrogel with light microscopy may be limited due to light scattering. Lack of autofluorescence allows fluorescence spectroscopy based imaging with low background unlike with other biomaterial scaffolds [28].…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PEMs coated specimens with chitosan as the outer layer show similar affinity of cell adhesion as bare metal substrates, which is in coherence with the cell viability result. Polymeric materials are known to hinder fluorescence imaging due to either autofluorescence or light scattering property of polymers [34]; thus, it is not possible to clearly identify the cells on PEMs coated specimens with PGA as the finishing layer in this experiment. A more direct method to observe the cell adhesion and affinity on a material is to observe cell attachment and morphology using fluorescence microscopy.…”
Section: Biocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Some of the original polymer nanolattices were used for fluorescence studies, which revealed the need to treat the polymer nanolattices with Sudan Black to suppress autofluorescence according to the protocol developed by Jaafar et al 30 (supplementary information, Fig. S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%