2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving flotation separation of apatite from dolomite using PAMS as a novel eco-friendly depressant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(b), in the mixed mineral flotation, DTAB and DAC still showed a good collectivity to quartz with a flotation recovery of more than 95% when the collector concentration was no less than 5 × 10 −4 mol/L, which was in accordance with the single-mineral flotation results. However, compared to the single-mineral flotation, the fluorapatite recovery (froth production) in the mixed-mineral flotation was a little (approximately 4%) higher at each DTAB concentration, which might be attributed to the fluorapatite coating on the surface of the quartz particles [28]. Conversely, the fluorapatite recovery (froth production) in the mixed-mineral flotation was approximately 8% lower at each DAC concentration in contrast to the single-mineral flotation, implying that quartz had larger adsorption of DAC compared to fluorapatite and resulting in fewer fluorapatite particles collected in the froth production.…”
Section: Micro-flotation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(b), in the mixed mineral flotation, DTAB and DAC still showed a good collectivity to quartz with a flotation recovery of more than 95% when the collector concentration was no less than 5 × 10 −4 mol/L, which was in accordance with the single-mineral flotation results. However, compared to the single-mineral flotation, the fluorapatite recovery (froth production) in the mixed-mineral flotation was a little (approximately 4%) higher at each DTAB concentration, which might be attributed to the fluorapatite coating on the surface of the quartz particles [28]. Conversely, the fluorapatite recovery (froth production) in the mixed-mineral flotation was approximately 8% lower at each DAC concentration in contrast to the single-mineral flotation, implying that quartz had larger adsorption of DAC compared to fluorapatite and resulting in fewer fluorapatite particles collected in the froth production.…”
Section: Micro-flotation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the particle sizes of more than 87wt% actual ores used for the flotation separation test were less than 0.074 µm. The chemical analysis results revealed that the actual ore contained 28 The DTAB and DDA utilized in this study were provided by Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., and the molecular structure of DTAB and DDA are described in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Minerals and Reagentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings had also been reported in the previous literature. [15][16][17] The contact angle of fluorite and dolomite after treatment with OA (Figures 8b and 9b) dramatically increased to 90.87°and 88.06°, respectively, illustrating that OA could significantly enhance their hydrophobicity, which matched well with their good floatability using OA alone. When used SPEemulsified OA as collector, the contact angle of fluorite sharply increased to 115.32°(Figure 8c).…”
Section: Contact Angle Analysismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Since low-grade phosphate ores must be processed to produce a high-quality phosphate concentrate, beneficiation procedures and reagents are crucial for achieving phosphate mineral separation. apatite is commonly linked with gangue minerals such as quartz, iron oxides, clays, and calcareous minerals in phosphate ores because it is one of the most important phosphorus-bearing minerals (e.g., dolomite and calcite) [5,6]. In the mineral processing, dolomite as a low-value mineral is usually removed from valuable minerals, such as apatite [7], magnesite [8], and rare earth minerals (e.g., monazite and bastnasite) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flotation is a separation and concentrate method that uses the physicochemical features of minerals to separate valuable minerals from gangue minerals [11][12][13], is regarded as the most effective method for removing dolomite from apatite [14]. Traditional fatty acid collectors, particularly oleic acid or its salts, are still the most widely used to separate apatite from dolomite because they are simple to make and inexpensive [3,6]. However, because of the non-selective adsorption behavior of these collectors towards both minerals by interacting with adsorption sites, the separation efficiency is still not sufficient [9,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%